The Alerted Eye
By: Andrew Muir

Do You Have “Strong Beliefs?”

I’ve been thinking a lot about the concept of ”belief” lately. Everybody has beliefs, and they vary a lot throughout the world. In fact, I can’t really think of two people I know that have the exact same set of beliefs about the nature of life and the universe.

And yet, all over the world there are organized systems of belief called “religions.” In my life, I’ve known a great number of people who have claimed to belong to these religious groups, and I’ve always tried my best to understand their beliefs. But I’ll be perfectly honest, I sometimes get confused.

Throughout the years, it has become evident to me that people really don’t know what they believe - that is, they have not actually given any clear reflection or thought to even their most fundamental positions regarding life and existence. If you disagree with me, then hold on because I can easily prove it. All that I ask is that you follow a few logical steps with me, and I will show you (even with an open mind) how some people’s individual beliefs are just fundamentally flawed.

For thousands of years, mankind did not know anything about where he was. People living in the Holy Roman Empire, for example, thought that their empire encompassed the entire universe. It’s same with the oriental Dynasties in the east. If somebody told you that there were dragons beyond the sea, you would have no good reason to believe otherwise. How would you know? That is what the world was like for much of the development of civilization.

Obviously, religions flourished during this era of human history because it gave people an answer. The story of Genesis, for example, provided people with a way of making sense of how life started. It gave people something to tell their children when they asked “Why are there clouds?” and “Where do people go when they die?” For thousands of years, religion provided the answers. Some faiths cunningly used the notion of a dual afterlife (heaven/hell) to instill moral rectitude among its subjects. Amazingly, it still persists to this day. Others taught that life was recycled into a new carnation until the soul had been purified. And for years, those beliefs were widely accepted as being factual.

When people in the Christian belief system were asked “Where did we come from?” they were told that god had created the Earth in seven days, and that all humans were descended from a single couple. And for centuries, this was also considered to be factual. And since many families currently living in North America are directly descended from the people in Holy Roman Empire, many of our beliefs and traditions have evolved into what we might call “modern Christianity.”

As the centuries marched on, and with the rise of the scientific method, people slowly became aware of the naturally occurring processes of biological development. It is called “evolution,” and it is a completely verifiable and readily observable fact of life. And yet, we still encounter some people who claim that they “do not believe in evolution” - in other words they still cling to the antiquated explanations of life on Earth. Many of them “believe” that the Earth itself is only several thousand years old. Pardon me if I sound close minded, but I find that to be an absolute insult to the virtues of knowledge and rationality that are so integral to human development.

Essentially, these people are saying that science has yielded incorrect results, right? They are basically saying that the entire network of established scientific minds is wrong. They say that evolution is only a theory despite the fact that it is proven… that the Earth is young despite a plainly obvious fossil record… that dinosaurs are a myth despite the presence of bones, or even that dinosaurs walked with man!

But HEY… that’s okay. If you choose not to believe in science, then I won’t put your beliefs down. It’s perfectly allowed. People can believe what they like in this world, and I’m in NO position to stop them.

BUT!!!

If you do not believe in evolution, or in the scientific method, then why do you go to the doctor’s office when you’re sick? Do you think he pulled that influenza vaccine out of his ass? Or could it be that modern medicine is inherently based on the posits made by science? Maybe you should think about the centuries of biological testing and scientific scrutiny that went into making that little vaccine possible. It’s the exact same testing and scientific scrutiny that says humans evolved, and the vaccine seems to work.

I think that most people today accept science as an explanation for natural phenomenon that they can see with our naked eyes. Why don’t people believe the natural processes that they can see under a microscope? You know, it was hundreds of years after the death of Copernicus that people finally started believing that the Earth revolved around the sun. How is it that even today some people still insist on denying similarly proven posits of science?

Simply put: to deny evolution is to deny a LARGE MAJORITY OF SCIENTIFIC FACT.

This is how I see it. There are only two ways your beliefs can make sense:

1) You accept evolution because you accept that science is a verifiable and observable reality of our existence, and evolution is inextricably tied to the rest of established science.

OR…

2) You maintain that all people on Earth are descended from Adam & Eve roughly 4000 years ago, that they were ejected from the Garden of Eden, that dinosaurs terrorized the Roman Empire and then mysteriously buried themselves under oceans and glaciers, and that thousands of mankind’s best thinkers have methodically collaborated over hundreds of years only to be wrong.

A lot of people like to avoid these two realities. But straight up… it’s one or the other. They’re mutually exclusive! There is absolutely no middle ground, because they contradict each other at the most fundamental level.

So when I ask people where they stand in their so-called “strong beliefs”, it’s no wonder that they have a hard time answering. The reason is simple. They don’t actually know! They don’t actually think about it, because if they did then they would run into concrete walls at every turn, and it become obvious that their “beliefs” on evolution are based on a complete lack of awareness.

“Blind faith” they say. I think that’s absolute horse-shit. It’s just being blind.  

But like I said, I know lots of religious people. And I don’t think they are stupid. I just think they have to struggle their whole lives to define what they believe, but they can never come to any kind of conclusion. But then again, who among us can?

And just because you accept evolution, it doesn’t mean that you can’t accept god. The POPE believed in evolution! Evolution explains HOW… but it still doesn’t explain WHY. And science never will explain why. There will always be a place for faith and spirituality. But COME ON! Evolution as much fact as the Earth revolving around the sun! Do some freaking reading for once! 

 —

PS. It’s important that we teach our children evolution correctly:

As opposed to the incorrect way (the gross over-simplifications of the church):

11 Responses to “Do You Have “Strong Beliefs?””

  1. its kind of contradictory in a way.

    Anonymous - February 8, 2007 at 11:06 pm

  2. Care to elaborate?

    alertedeye - February 9, 2007 at 3:18 am

  3. well you make it sort of clear that you completely disagree with christianity but that everyone has their own views and beliefs so its all good. But then you go on to bash it and say its stupid and ignorant if i may, to believe or have blind faith. I respect people who have ‘blind faith’ but not so much the ones who just say they have it to cover up the fact that they themselves dont even know WHAT their religion is. Its pointless if you go about it that way. Personally i like to rant on about things i disagree with, but dont like opinions shoved on me. hah Human fucking nature.
    Also i think religion is whatever the holder believes it to be.
    For instance, the bibles full of parables and metaphors, everyone interprets things differently, so theres all this speculation about what certain passages mean. No one will ever know. Maybe Gods not real. Its our choice to believe and i think we should respect eachother because its not our job to force religions or theories onto eachother. Its nice not to be ignorant though. And yes, I’m aware this is a rather large paragraph of contradiction. And youre still reading it.

    Anonymous - February 9, 2007 at 6:31 pm

  4. I argree with your opinion. I feel that people who believe in a religion shouldhave some knowledge as to what exactly they are believing in. Keep in mind that some people follow a religion (or simply go to church), not because of its beliefs, but because of the messages or personal benifits people can take in. With that said; I wonder if there’s a sort of paradox in that.

    In response to not knowing if there is anything that lies between
    religion and evolution, i think there may be (probably not directly in the middle, but more towards the religous end). Voltair constructed a belief: Deism, which disregards the theories of ‘devine revelation’ and the Genisus. But you should deffinatly check deism out.

    PITME - February 9, 2007 at 8:31 pm

  5. For me the point is simply this:
    Evolution and faith can coexist VERY easily. To deny only PARTS of known science is impossible, because science is built upon itself. And by virtue of being based on rationality and verifiability, cannot be in the middle. Its either right or wrong.

    I’m saying I wish people would just accept that the Earth is old and people are just complex animals.

    I’m NOT saying that god/religion should have any less bearing on our lives. After all, where did the Universe come from? Damned if science is ever gonna tell you. I do believe in god, in some sense of the word. I just don’t think god directly intervened in human history… he is just the omniscient force behind the existence of humanity. Can we agree on that? I hope so.

    alertedeye - February 9, 2007 at 9:39 pm

  6. theres so much unanswered in religion, but in evolution as well. theres a lot of gaps, I dont see how an animal can evolve into a bunch of different things, and if that one cell evolved into the plant, then grew gills, then freed itself from the ocean floor because it was more efficient to capture its food, WHAT WAS ITS FOOD, wasn’t that fish the one that evolved into a bunch of other fish who went on to evolve into all other creatures? it was the only thing existing. Unless Im totally misunderstanding this. I dont see the difference in blindly believing in religion and blindly believing in science. Scientists change their verdict over and over, at one point they thought flies grew as a product of the meat and later discovered that flies layed eggs in it. The fact is, we’ll never know the answer to existance and i think trying to find it is a big fat waste of time.

    Anonymous - February 10, 2007 at 12:12 pm

  7. You are right that searching for the answer to existence is futile. But the answer to the development of LIFE on Earth is very much answerable, and an entirely relevent human endeavour. It helps us to better understand our environment, and our position within nature. There are benefits to that, I think.

    As for your claim to not understand the subtler processes of evolutionary biology, have you tried reading up on it? It’s not difficult to understand, but very few people actually take the time to learn what evolution actually means. (See Mrs. Garrisons lesson in the video above.)

    I can recommend “Dinosaur in a Haystack” or “Full House” by biologist Stephen Jay Gould. They give very thourough explanations of the often misunderstood parts of evolution (such as how wings evolved, and the reasons why certain adaptations occur at all). You will find that these questions are covered with great detail, and that once learned they do make perfect sense. For example; if you consider how many FAILED mutations might have occured, it becomes more obvious how successful mutations (even if only occuring once every million years) can absolutely produce cascading physical changes in any species. It is really incredibly how adaptible life is. It only takes one generation for a creature to inherit the traits of its forebears. Consider that over billions of years… what the kinds of amazing complexity that can be produced given enough time, and given enough randomly occuring mutations (that sometimes give a creature an advantage in its environment, and thus allows that mutated gene to be favoured).

    Of course, to us, it all seems magical and impossible. Keep an open mind when reading up on it, and I can garuantee that evolution will start to make a bit more sense. If you still choose to believe that it will eventually prove untrue, then I won’t argue with you. Science has been wrong many times before. My only point is that science is never HALF wrong. It is entirely possible that scientists are absolutely wrong about what they’ve said, but not that they’re ONLY right about the flu virus, and NOT about evolution of species (flu vaccines are, after all, based on the fact that they mutate and become stronger every few million generations).

    Like I said… you can deny evolution all you want, and I can’t say you are wrong. Similarly, you can deny that the flu exists all you want, and similarly, I can’t say you are wrong. The point is that they are the same thing, they are the same science, and I just don’t see why people feel that it threatens established religion. Evolution, after all, does not come within a million miles of explaining WHY there is life.

    As for your comment that evolutionary science is a waste of time, think about what I said next time you go to get a flu shot. Why do they make new vaccines every now and then? How does the virus change? Modern medical science is all based on and tied in with evolution and biology, so I DO NOT agree that it is “a waste of time.”

    And if you are going to argue by telling me that “viruses” and “people” are different because of their size, then do the readings I suggested, and you will see that it is wrong. Biological complexity is relative.

    alertedeye - February 10, 2007 at 3:32 pm

  8. I think God created the Atom.

    your ex - February 11, 2007 at 10:03 am

  9. I agree with my ex. Because that is just another way of saying “I believe that God is responsible for the things just beyond the boundaries of known science.”

    The universe is essentially a long causality chain: society exists because life evolved, life exists because of chemicals, chemicals exist cause of atoms, etc. That is a bit of an oversimplification, but you get the idea. It’s essentially saying “God created the codes by which everything exists.”

    The point is that science explains a lot of causes and effects, but the ULTIMATE cause will always be beyond human comprehension. That’s where my belief in an omnipotent creator comes in.

    alertedeye - February 11, 2007 at 4:41 pm

  10. There is some things that should be clarified about evolution. Evolution occurs in different species simultaneously over long periods of time. Think of evolution as an expanding net rather than a chain. The question concerning what these no-longer-bottom-dweller fish would eat is simple: No-longer-bottom-dweller prey. These prey evolve because survival is more likely off-the-bottom. And evolution is a continuous process. The same goes for science in general. It is a continuous process. Science may have been wrong in the past, but it continues to investigate unknown phenomena and reassesses “current” knowledge. Not to say that this new knowledge is right, but it is less wrong than it was before. Know if you believe religion is the same as it was back in the days that it was originally founded, then you are believing in something that doesn’t reassess and itself when new knowledge is available. And this is usually where the church will say that some new knowledge is outright WRONG (100% wrong). Now, that is true ignorance!

    I am not an atheist, I am an agnostic. I also believe in a higher power. I cannot figure out the beginning of existence otherwise. But I believe that organised religion tries to battle against the development of new ideas, and rather live in the dark til the end of time. Personally, I am not completely opposed to religion, because I think it is a nice mechanism to keep the general public in check. The average person needs someone or something to tell keep them moral. But, in this day-and-age, why be the average person (with similar critical-thinking skills to the average person in medieval times)? I’ll tell you why murder is wrong. It pisses others off and you’ll end up dead yourself. Evolution. I’ll tell you why stealing is wrong. It pisses others off and you’ll end up dead. Evolution. I’ll tell you why… Well, you get the gist. And you don’t have to look at just humans for this. Look at other species also. Why do you need a book to tell us what is right and what is wrong?

    An unfortunate thing is that humans believe that mankind is the final step in evolution. We are not the final product. Other things will evolve to a similar sentient state that we are at. Especially when we go extinct. We are the only species that believe that we inherited the Earth from God, and that it is ours for the taking. And this thinking will inevitably be our undoing. We continually fight against nature, and even consider ourselves as seperate entities from nature. Let’s just see how far this thinking will take us.

    A little off-topic: People who believe that their religion is the one right religion, consider this. Religion is completely regional. People born in Europe are likely to be Christian. People born in India are likely to be Sikh or Hindu. People born in China are likely to be Buddhist. If you were born in another region of the world you would have likely adopted that faith. If there is one right belief, how come a person’s faith is predominantly dependent on birthplace? I know every religious person will argue, but it’s funny how a representative from each faith will argue the exact same argument. Know matter your beliefs, consider letting your children be open-minded. Say “I believe the world was created by…” instead of saying “the world was created by…” when raising your children.

    That’s all I got.

    Mark - February 13, 2007 at 11:46 am

  11. Hey Mark - this is a little late, but you do make sense. I just want to point out that if you are born in China (modern china) you are not actually likely to be Buddhist. You are completely correct when you say religion is regional (and almost certainly a human social construct), but in China today, the official “religion” is no religion. Still most Chinese (I am half Chinese myself) practice a form of ancestor worship, and a collection of ancient folk beliefs. Buddhism plays a major role in China but it is certainly not the major religion. Sorry I’m being negative - your post is actually correct. I just do a lot of research on religion (despite being an “unbeliever” myself).

    Nations which do have a Buddhist majority are Thailand, Burma, Nepal, and Tibet (currently under administration by the PRC, called the Tibet Autonomous region - although the “autonomous” part is really quite a joke).

    The Thieving Magpie - December 9, 2007 at 12:24 pm

Leave a Reply